kellensarts:

the Magnetic & the Fast

Lorna (Dane) and Peter (Pietro) Maximoff from x-men cinematic universe
they are my favorite characters from marvel comics! 

I know that they no siblings anymore in the comics, but if i got it right, lorna is magneto’s daughter too, so i drew them as siblings!

Well, the whole point of that forced retcon by Marvel was their spat with Fox. As far as I’m concerned, they’re still siblings.

Why Polaris should have a female writer

I’ve had someone (not here, elsewhere) say that my suggestion that perhaps Polaris should have a female writer and no male writers is extreme. It’s not. Here’s why.

Polaris’ key problem in comics is that she’s always written as if her only value comes from being a supporting character for men around her. Mainly Havok, with the risk rising with Magneto. Who writes all these issues? Men. Men tend to default into things that benefit men. They come into these stories from a male perspective, looking at characters with a male gaze, coming up with ideas that ultimately feed into the interests of men – both male readers and male characters.

This is less likely to happen with women.

Women come into these stories with the lived experience of being a woman in the modern world. They know the barriers they have to overcome, the (usually negative and harmful) assumptions made about their capabilities, the difference between love vs lust, how awful and harmful controlling men can be, and so much else. First and foremost, women know what it’s like to have to fight back against people underestimating your worth.

All of these things are focal issues for Polaris. The character destruction she endured for decades, and still suffers from to this day, can ultimately be described as the damage of sexism.

Men will never fully understand this. They can try, and they might come pretty close, but there’s nuance men will never fully grasp. Men are not living as women. They only witness the lives of women from the outside, in the fleeting moments where women are in their presence. They don’t deal with catcalling or doxxing/revenge porn or “nice guys” as women deal with. They don’t have to worry about bosses perceiving qualities they would normally see as “powerful” in men as “bitchy” when displayed by women.

Lorna would benefit greatly from a female writer because a female writer would actually understand what she’s had to put up with as a character and have much better ideas of how to correct those problems.

Men do not. And I expect X-Men Blue will be a strong example of my point here with future issues.

Allow me to say a little something about this picture that is very much not good. Some people are going to think this is nitpicking. I don’t care. I’m writing this because I feel like it’s a necessary post, especially in light of how everyone else is being so lax on criticism when it’s needed most.

I’ve seen some of the response online. I’ve seen how everyone’s emphasizing her bursting onto the scene, suggesting an imminent beatdown.

I’m not looking at that.

I’m looking at something more important: the text and subtext.

Look at that description. Look at it.

If you’re a random casual fan, randomly picking up this issue to read it, what are you learning from this box? Because that’s the point of this box. The point is to tell people who have no idea who this character is, what defining features you should take away from her.

This book’s response? “Polaris is Magneto’s daughter. That’s the only thing about her worth knowing.”

There are other things they could have said here in addition to this description. A hell of a lot else. First and foremost would have been her moniker as “Mistress of Magnetism.” Genoshan Survivor would have been great given what’s happening on New Tian. Lorna is not exclusively Magneto’s daughter with zero traits of her own worth noting beyond that. There. Are. Other. Things.

And I’m well aware of the rule about no more than 50 characters on a single panel. I’m not even going to bother to count what’s already there because there are always cases where the rules can and should be bent or broken. “There was a character limit” isn’t an excuse.

Now, for the dialogue.

She shows up on the scene and the first words out of her mouth are about her history with Havok.

This looks innocent to the layperson, and on its own under ordinary circumstances, it would be. It’s a problem when you combine it with other factors.

X-Men Blue #7 and #8 spent time to establish Havok as a character in his own right beforehand. He showed up in the middle of #7, got many lines of dialogue, and hurt a lot of characters while leading a group.

Polaris shows up at the end of #8, only hurts Havok, and her only dialogue is about him. Message of this dialogue: her value is in her relationship to Havok, not in her own wants, needs and interests that transcend him.

Combine both sets of text, what you have is this: “Polaris’ only value is from the men in her life. If they did not exist, she would have nothing to offer and have no reason to be in this or any other comic book.”

Which is a longstanding problem Polaris has had throughout her history with Havok. For most of her history, she could only appear wherever Havok appeared, and if he wasn’t there, she couldn’t be used. He leaves the X-Men, she leaves the X-Men. He goes off into space, she goes off into space. He joins X-Factor, she joins X-Factor. When Havok was presumed dead but really sent to the Mutant X universe, Polaris was written as isolating herself in an apartment obsessing over an old shirt of Havok’s until writers decided to actually try her on Genosha.

We’re starting to get a similar problem with Magneto – which bugs the hell out of me since restoring their family ties was such an uphill battle in itself. Starting 2015, Polaris has only been allowed to appear in:

  • The Magneto solo
  • Secret Wars: House of M
  • Deadpool and the Mercs for Money
  • X-Men Blue

In every single case here, the emphasis has been mainly on Magneto as her father. SW:HoM was the best of the bunch and was an excellent model for how to do it right, but it’s not being pursued.

I can’t make this any clearer. Polaris is more than just the men in her life. Making her cliffhanger appearance into “She’s Magneto’s daughter, and Havok’s ex-girlfriend, and those are the only two things worth knowing about her” is a disservice to her potential.

If the next issue is amazing, then awesome. I want it to be amazing. I want to be wrong. But, this one page alone is a huge warning sign and huge turn off for me. I’ve decided I’m not buying the physical copy of X-Men Blue #9, as I originally planned to do, because I don’t trust the book to use her right after an intro like this – and I have absolutely nothing that says I could be wrong in expecting the worst in what’s to come.

Marvel Comics’ Nostalgia Problem

It’s taken me two days longer than intended to write this. I had to be ready, and not simply force it out half-assed. What I have to say is genuine and I wanted to get every ounce of that into my post.

Marvel has a nostalgia problem. A huge one.

There are so, so, so many characters and franchises and ideas at Marvel’s beck and call. There are characters who were written horribly for decades that could really use some revisiting. Characters that were screwed over in various ways who deserve a real, considerate touch. I know this because I’m a huge fan of Polaris. I’ve seen both how she’s been wronged as a character for decades, and how much raw untapped potential she has in her own right. She’s just one character. Marvel has so many others who could be made into something more and greater.

None of that happens. Because nostalgia by people at Marvel gets in the way of any possibility whatsoever at success in this vein.

The current X-Men books are an excellent example of this problem. X-Men Blue is a throwback to the original 5. X-Men Gold is a throwback to the 70s and 80s. New Mutants is a throwback to, you guessed it, the New Mutants book of yesteryear. Iceman and Jean Grey and the upcoming Cable are all books beholden to characters conceived of as having huge fanbases because of the past. Weapon X is all about the Wolverine stuff, because Wolverine was extremely popular.

And then at SDCC recently, they announced X-Men: Grand Design. This is a series about Uncanny X-Men #1-#280, what’s always promoted as the “golden age of the X-Men.” Which, as a Polaris fan, grates on me because this was the worst period in her entire character history.

Yet it’s going to be retold. It’s being held up on a pedestal and treated like revisiting that entire run in summarized form, with undoubtedly all the awfulness of how it treated Lorna (when they can find a spot for it), is how comics should be made.

As a Polaris fan, I have insight into what an uphill battle it is to get Marvel to acknowledge any of what she could offer. It all comes down to nostalgia.

Tom Brevoort was thoroughly dismissive of Polaris being Magneto’s daughter and having anything to do with Scarlet Witch because of his nostalgia telling him Polaris isn’t worth the time of day.

Nostalgia told Marvel that, after returning from space, Polaris “had” to join X-Factor with Havok, who she “had” to be with. Nostalgia tells Marvel that Lorna’s trauma and continuing thoughts over surviving Genosha can’t be explored, because to people at Marvel, such a major and pivotal moment “doesn’t fit” Lorna to them. They think something so major should go to other characters and be explored by them while Polaris gets nothing.

Because Polaris herself is a victim of nostalgia. The sort of nostalgia Marvel has toward Polaris is the sort built by the Claremont era: the idea that she’s a minor character to be thrown into limbo and only occasionally dredged back up for a few brief issues, usually to build up other characters and look stupid or weak in the process. That’s the image Claremont created of her, and people on the comics side of Marvel are so beholden to nostalgia that it’s the image they fall back on.

There’s never any using the past for the future. Polaris could be used to add new dimensions to Iceman’s coming out as gay, because of the love triangle they were in and how far back they go, but Marvel will never use that. Polaris could provide teen Jean Grey with insight into her adult self’s development, since Polaris was friends and teammates with adult Jean well before any other women came along, but Marvel will never use that. Those things will never happen at the comics side of Marvel we see today. Marvel would have to toss off the nostalgia goggles that make them think those connections are irrelevant just because Claremont in the nostalgic “golden age” didn’t do anything with them.

There’s being a fan and building on the past, and then there’s being a fanboy and holding back progress to keep everything in a state that fits your nostalgia. Marvel is all fanboys. It’s all people who revert things back to their fondest memory and hold it there in stasis.

There’s an ulterior motive for the X-Men franchise’s treatment, though. Everything I said above is true across all of Marvel comics. But, the X-Men franchise is specifically being framed by Marvel as a “dying has-been franchise with its best years behind it.” This is deliberate because Marvel is pissy about Fox having the X-Men film rights. They want to diminish the brand to, in their minds (but not in reality), hurt Fox.

A final case study: X-Men Blue. There are many good things, and many bad things, about the book. One of the bad things I’m going to highlight: how it handles cameos of obscure characters.

Every issue is like a smorgasbord of nostalgia. “Hey! Here’s this obscure character!” “Hey, remember this storyline?” “Isn’t it cool we got to see this 20 year old character again!”

But… it lacks anything of substance. It’s empty. These appearances as presented only mean anything if you’re someone beholden by nostalgia. None of them give enough time to really explore any of the obscure characters you see. If you’re a casual fan, you get absolutely no sense of what these characters are really about or who they are as characters. They appear, they disappear, like fireflies.

Meanwhile, Marvel gives Scarlet Witch a solo book that lasts for a year despite low sales, and puts out books starring characters that were the bee’s knees 20-30 years ago but a lot of people don’t really give a shit about today.

And that’s not to say those characters can’t be interesting, but they’re going about it the wrong way, blinded by nostalgia. They’re not seeing things as they are today. They’re seeing things as they were when they were kids.

By the way, this is easy for me to say for one reason: I don’t have the nostalgia problem they do.

I didn’t start to give a shit about Marvel until I found out Polaris existed. Because Marvel acted like she was a pox upon their house for decades, I didn’t find out Polaris existed until I was in my 20s. And I found her by accident. She was my gateway into the Marvel universe. I got to see what could be through her.

And I got to see how Marvel ruined what could be, just to flail at what once was and will never be again.

My examples are X-Men, but like I said, it goes beyond that. One More Day is a notorious example of Quesada wanting to dive into his own nostalgia of a bachelor Peter Parker. One online critic I used to watch noted that Peter Parker was at one point either a professor or a teacher (can’t remember which), but ultimately Marvel sent him right back to being some down on his luck young’un.

Development is anathema to the sort of nostalgia that runs rampant at Marvel.

Which is ultimately why I know for a fact that current Marvel will never understand the potential of characters like Polaris, much less explore that potential. You have to be prepared to look forward and create a brighter future, informed by the past. Marvel is completely incapable of that.

It’s also one of many reasons why I place so much in The Gifted with Fox. It’s not trying to “recapture nostalgia.” It’s making something new informed by the past. Moving forward. Working in the present.

Something Marvel can’t do.